{"id":6934,"date":"2011-11-30T15:02:25","date_gmt":"2011-11-30T13:02:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bhkrf.se\/?p=6934"},"modified":"2011-12-01T12:21:20","modified_gmt":"2011-12-01T10:21:20","slug":"svt-o-kritici-u-nadi-da-je-niko-ne-cita%e2%80%a6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bhkrf.se\/bs\/2011\/11\/30\/svt-o-kritici-u-nadi-da-je-niko-ne-cita%e2%80%a6\/","title":{"rendered":"SVT o kritici: u nadi da je niko ne \u010dita\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Mezarje

Mezarje u spomen obilje\u017eju u Poto\u010darima kraj Srebrenice<\/p><\/div>\n

Tekst: Carl Johan \u00c5kerberg<\/a><\/p>\n

Izvor: Tankebrott<\/a> :: SVT om kritiken: hoppas p\u00e5 att ingen l\u00e4ser p\u00e5\u2026<\/a> :: 29. novembra 2011.<\/p>\n

Eva Hamilton [direktorica \u0161vedske televizije SVT<\/a>] ne voli biti kritikovana, barem ne kada se kritike odnose na odluke o emitovanju. <\/p>\n

List Dagens Nyheter, DN, izvje\u0161tava<\/a> da je SVT<\/a> dobio vrlo kriti\u010dno pismo zbog prikazivanja kritikovanog dokumentarca Grad koji je \u017ertvovan<\/em>. Po\u0161iljalac pisma je Tribunal za ratne zlo\u010dine, ili ispravnije kazano The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia<\/em> (ICTY<\/a>). Me\u0111utim, to uop\u0161te nije ta\u010dno, jer je po\u0161iljalac zapravo Nerma Jela\u010di\u0107, \u0161efica Odjela za Outreach<\/em>, tj. odgovorna za komunikacije.<\/p>\n

Za\u0161to je to tako va\u017eno? Jer se Eva Hamilton pokriva slobodom govora u vezi s intervjuom za Resum\u00e9<\/a>.<\/p>\n

U mom svijetu \u0107e sud suditi, a ne raznim dopisima poku\u0161avati uticati na novinarstvo i slobodu govora. Ovdje se izri\u010dito zahtijeva od onoga \u0161to se zove dr\u017eavna televizija, tj. SVT [\u0160vedska televizija], kada slijede\u0107i put budemo radili neki program o genocidu u Srebrenici, da se predstavnik Suda intervjui\u0161e.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Krenimo iz po\u010detka, od toga da sud poku\u0161ava uticati na novinarstvo. Mo\u017eemo konstatovati da po\u0161iljalac ni na koji na\u010din nije osu\u0111iva\u010dki dio ICTY-a, ve\u0107 njegov Odjel za komunikacije.<\/p>\n

Odjel za komunikacije, ili Outreach<\/em>, uglavnom djeluje na podru\u010dju koje se nekada zvalo Jugoslavija. Primarni zadatak je pove\u0107anje transparentnosti u radu Tribunala i informisanje o de\u0161avanjima. No, njegov zadatak je tako\u0111e (moje poja\u010danje):<\/p>\n

In addition to responding to inquiries, Outreach endeavours to be pro-active in that it follows events in the region closely and responds to possible misperceptions and misrepresentations of the Tribunal\u2019s work by addressing these issues and providing accurate and timely information on relevant topics<\/strong>. Outreach officers provide information to the media and serve as Tribunal spokespersons in respective countries.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

To zna\u010di da je jedan od zadataka informisanje u slu\u010dajevima kada se rad Tribunala pogre\u0161no shvata ili se na drugi na\u010din iskrivljuje.<\/p>\n

Zadnja re\u010denica u odbrani Hamiltonove, o zahtjevu da predstavnik Tribunala ho\u0107e<\/em> intervju, ne nalazi se u pismu. Ono \u0161to se tra\u017ei jeste prilika da se isprave direktne gre\u0161ke oko rada Tribunala (moje poja\u010danje):<\/p>\n

I would, however<\/strong>, ask that should you decide to broadcast any further material which contradicts facts irrefutably established by the ICTY including those related to the Srebrenica genocide, that the ICTY be given the opportunity to present its findings.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Dakle, predstavnik Odjela za komunikacija moli da dobije priliku da ka\u017ee o tome do \u010dega je do\u0161ao Tribunal. Te\u0161ko da \u201dho\u0107e\u201d i da \u201dzahtijeva\u201d. \u010cinjenica je da autor pisma vi\u0161e nego dovoljno nagla\u0161ava da nije<\/em> rije\u010d o kontroli emitovanja SVT-a:<\/p>\n

The Outreach Programme does not question the right to freedom of expression and editiorial choice and it would be beyond my remit to comment on a decision by a state broadcaster to air a particular documentary.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Ono \u0161to zatim slijedi je dugo obja\u0161njavanje za\u0161to je pismo poslano, da dokumentarni film koji se bavi genocidom u Srebrenici bez uzimanja rada i uloge Suda u slu\u010daju Srebrenica zaslu\u017euje pa\u017enju.<\/p>\n

\"Iskopavanja

Iskopavanja u blizini Srebrenice, 2007.<\/p><\/div>\n

Vi\u0161e iz intervjua u Resum\u00e9u:<\/p>\n

Hamiltonova ka\u017ee da autor pisma ne pokazuje nikakve \u010dinjeni\u010dne neta\u010dnosti u filmu, ve\u0107 detaljno opisuje da su presude u Haagu utvrdile da je katastrofa u Srebrenici bila upravo genocid. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Ova izjava me nagoni da razmislim da li je Hamiltonova a) uop\u0161te pro\u010ditala pismo ili b) samo ga prelistala, jer sa na predzadnjoj stranici pisma nalazi slijede\u0107e:<\/p>\n

It therefore follows that the genocide ruling also contradicts the following explicit and implied points made in the documentary:<\/p>\n

(a) That the Bosnian Muslim attack on Visnjica on 26. June 1995 was a \u2018marching order l8, for the Bosnian Serbs, somehow provoking the events that followed the fall of Srebrenica. Proceedings before the Tribunal have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Srebrenica was a planned killing operation and not a spontaneous act ofrevenge.<\/p>\n

(b) That arms supplied to Srebrenica were connected to its ultimate fate and the implication that the male inhabitants of Srebrenica could have been spared, had they agreed to lay down their arms. Evidence from the exhumations that the Trial Chamber reviewed in the Krstic case shows that most ofthe victims were not killed in combat but in mass executions.<\/p>\n

(c) That only c.2000 individuals were executed in the first 48 hours following the fall of Srebrenica and the implication that the remaining numbers killed afterwards were killed as military targets \u2013 that those killed were \u2018company to battalion size groups trying to break through, with civilians with them, to their second core lines around Tuzla, who were \u2018just killed in large numbers by artillery fire, by machine gun fire because the Serbs were able to locate them.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Uz to su fusnote za stavke 18\u201324 kojima se navode vremena u dokumentarcu. Skupa s pregledom onoga do \u010dega je Tribunal do\u0161ao to prili\u010dno konkretno ukazuje na ono \u0161to se smatra da su neta\u010dnosti u dokumentarcu, a \u0161to Hamiltonova tvrdi da se u pismu ne nalazi.<\/p>\n

Sa\u017eetak<\/div>\n

Reakcija Eve Hamilton na pismo, kao predstavnice SVT-a, je vrlo osjetljiva. Posebno kada se na web stranici SVT-a<\/a> izra\u017eava jo\u0161 \u017ee\u0161\u0107e prema po\u0161iljaocu pisma nego u intervjuu za Resum\u00e9:<\/p>\n

\u2013 Ha\u0161ki tribunal se ne\u0107e pona\u0161ati kao cenzor slobodnih medija.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Reakcija Tankebrotta<\/em> je: gdje se u pismu nalazi taj poku\u0161aj cenzure? Zar ne bi bilo od interesa za SVT da predstavnicima ICTY-a upravo pru\u017ei priliku za repliku, da vodi to pitanje i diskutuje na\u0161u nedavnu historiju? Zar ne spada u dobru novinarsku praksu da se da rije\u010d i drugoj strani ili prilika za repliku? Vjerujemo li u ono \u0161to Savez novinara (Journalistf\u00f6rbundet<\/a>) pi\u0161e na svojoj stranici, upravo tako \u0107emo to i uva\u017eavati.<\/p>\n

Kao \u0161to dr\u017eavna televizija ima novinarsku odgovornost, isto je i kada stigne kritika na emitovani materijal. Odbaciti kritiku kao \u201dcenzorski \u017ear\u201d i sli\u010dno nije samo glupo, to je kontraproduktivno i na kraju se \u010dovjek mo\u017ee na\u0107i u magare\u0107oj klupi.<\/p>\n

Preveo: Haris Tucakovi\u0107<\/p>\n

Povezani linkovi: SVT prima o\u0161tre kritike od Ha\u0161kog tribunala<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tekst: Carl Johan \u00c5kerberg | Eva Hamilton ne voli biti kritikovana, barem ne kada se kritike odnose na odluke o emitovanju | List Dagens Nyheter, DN, izvje\u0161tava da je SVT dobio vrlo kriti\u010dno pismo zbog prikazivanja kritikovanog dokumentarca Grad koji je \u017ertvovan<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":6920,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,25,3],"tags":[420,40,138,127],"class_list":["post-6934","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-demokratija","category-kultura-2","category-opste","tag-bosna-i-hercegovina","tag-kultura","tag-srebrenica-bs","tag-umjetnost"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bhkrf.se\/bs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6934","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bhkrf.se\/bs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bhkrf.se\/bs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bhkrf.se\/bs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bhkrf.se\/bs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6934"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.bhkrf.se\/bs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6934\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6978,"href":"https:\/\/www.bhkrf.se\/bs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6934\/revisions\/6978"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bhkrf.se\/bs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6920"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bhkrf.se\/bs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6934"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bhkrf.se\/bs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6934"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bhkrf.se\/bs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6934"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}